Gulaal: A Flawed Masterpiece! review
Status
Dileep Singh (Raja Chaudhary) the protagonist of Gulaal and the film have much in common. While Raja plays to the tunes of his manipulators, in the film the director is the manipulator who always has his way that can also be looked at as Anurag Kashyap's directorial signature.
Gulaal unlike “No Smoking” has a fairly earthly plot- a naïve man caught in the politics of ambitious, powerful and shrewd people. Dileep joins a law college in a fictitious Rajsthan city Rajpur, where he falls into the hands of a series of manipulators leading to his emotional devastation.
But will Anurag Kashyap let something remain as simple as it sounds? He elevates the narrative to mythical plains and inhabits the plot with characters and eccentricities that we’ve come to associate with the signature style of the director.
While this eccentric style of the cinematically extravagant director has the capacity to enthrall the aficionados but at the same time it can also baffle those who’re looking for a “simple story well told”.
Look at the parlor where the protagonist comes to live. This is a world onto itself, dazzled with colors and neon lights. It is a classy bar with a huge portrait of master guitarist Jimmy Hendrix, a neon bicycle and the number “69”, a weight scale with colorful lights usually found on railway platforms. The bar is called “Hello There”!. Something that stands out from the rest of Rajpur. The justification behind the bar is that it was set up by Britishers and now belongs to the local royals.
Dileep is a feeble, ill-witted protagonist, who accepts suffering as his destiny in order to stay out of trouble. After a humiliating ragging session at the college, he tries to forget it but his roommate (rather bar mate!) Ransa (Abhimanyu Singh) drags him into college politics. While Ransa drags Dileep into power play, he himself is dragged into it by ambitious Rajput separatist Dukey Bana (Kay Kay Menon). As an omen of the fate awaiting Dileep, Ransa gets killed at the hands of his rivals. But this doesn’t end the trouble for Dileep but begins a new series of problems, he is forced to contest union election at the behest of Dukey and play puppet in his hands.
It’s a twisted story, where everyone plays a puppet in someone else’s hands. Protagonist Dileep is first manipulated by his roommate Ransa. Ransa plays a puppet in the hands of Dukey Bana, who is manipulated by Kiran (Ayesha Mohan) and she’s a puppet in the hands of Karan her brother.
Two characters who catch one’s attention (and they’re meant to do that..) are Prithvi Bana (Piyush Mishra) and his body painted accompaniment who is meant to be Ardha Narishwara. While Anurag gives us little insight into Piyush’s character- a foreign returned and a literally enlightened man, who sees through the mess of affairs- but he lets the Ardha Narishwar (who is often dressed up as Hanuman) remain a mystery. Prithvi is also the classic idiot who delivers a number of insightful punch lines.
On IMDb, the film is classified as a thriller! Well, it had every potential to be made into a thriller. It also had the possibility to be made into a love story of the driest kind or a story about corruptible powers of “power”. But ironically it’s none ‘¦and all!
After a power packed opening, an enraged speech by Kay Kay, the story proceeds in a meandering, brooding pace. Anurag doesn’t waste time in establishing the characters, he leaves us mostly on our own. It’s an unfamiliar world, we know little about every single character including the protagonist. Questions such as where they come from, why they’re behaving in a certain manner are left better unanswered.
You will see Anurag’s narrative strategy to alienate us from the story and characters at work here (after alienating viewers successfully in DevD). You won’t identify with any character, neither will you feel anything for anybody. It’s a distant view of the lives of strangers for whom we feel nothing. That makes it rather a detached, clinical study of their behavior under certain circumstances.
A film that doesn’t follow the established traditions of good storytelling, a protagonist who is as weak and helpless as a matchstick, where every character is overtaken by some internal conflict and where everybody is just a puppet to somebody else. And that’s why it’s the director who rules. More than anything it’s a signature work of a director. A flawed one, maybe, but nevertheless a master’s work.
It’s heartwarming to hear the songs of the film, which are evidently inspired by some of the great poets of Hindi. Influences of Jayashankar Prasad and Ramdhari Singh “Dinkar” are clearly seen in the style of rendition. One can also draw parallels between Rashmirathi, the epic poetry of Dinakar and the film. Dinakar’s masterpiece tells the tale of Karna, the mythological character, the illegitimate son of Kunti, the mother of Pandavas and Gulaal is also the story of Karan, the illegitimate son of a Maharaja. Interestingly Karan emerges victorious in the film and unlike Mahabharata, he’s is the real manipulator, who makes a puppet out of everybody in the film.
Rajeev Ravi’s cinematography is impressive. Interestingly, Gulaal, is perhaps the most colorfully shot dark film.
Dialogues and their rendition remind me of the brooding, non reflexive style of acting that was favored by some new wave directors, especially the ones who followed Robert Bresson.
Well, the film might not have the universal appeal that Dev. D had but it isn’t as perplexing as “No Smoking”. It’s neither a conventional good film, nor a conventional path breaking narrative. Anurag Kashyap isn’t inclined to tell just a simple story but he is also perennially obsessed with cinema itself. You will find intertexual references, tributes and influences a galore. His brilliance lies in the fact that he makes such a brooding, meandering, unconventional piece of cinema engaging as well.
Watch it with an open mind, it’s a flawed work of a genius but every flaw bears the stamp of the director.
A flawed masterpiece!
[rating:3.5]











Comments( 13 )
Very interesting analysis Bikas..your
Very interesting analysis Bikas..your reading of the mythological reference goes to show just how layered the film really is and calls for a second viewing maybe..yes in a sense its a modern day mahabharata..here "Karna" is not just an outcaste but he is also the manipulator and the mover..the only one who is not a puppet..in that sense the character can also be a (irreverent) re-interpretaion of Krishna as well?
But the problem is Anurag Kashyap's characterization is so deliberately obtuse and sketchy that its impossible to be 100 percent sure about anything in this film!
@ Aniruddha,yes I believe the Karan is
@ Aniruddha,yes I believe the Karan is the mythological Karna, who plots and manipulates everybody to redeem himself and seek legitimacy. Interesting observation, yes he could very well be a re-interpretation of Krishna.
Since you're bringing in the issue of characterization--just see how Anurag loves week protagonists, flawed characters, who are always at the mercy of somebody else, be is "No Smoking", "Dev. D" or "Gulaal".
Nice review Bikas.."a flawed
Nice review Bikas.."a flawed masterpiece' is a good ending..leaves me unsure of whether i should or i shouldnt be going to watch it :grin:
Great...I am already looking forward to
Great...I am already looking forward to see Gulaal....but before that lemme complete my homework...I will read Rashmirathi before watching :-D
Bikas ji WEAK not WEEK :razz:
Just back after watching Gulaal...and I
Just back after watching Gulaal...and I almost agree with your review...including the 'flawed parts with a master's sign'..
Loved the way u interpreted Karan as Karna...Its a real possibility...
@Payal, I think film deserves a
@Payal, I think film deserves a chance.
@Queen, thank you for pointing out "week" thing.
@Praveen, thank you. Yes, Karan is Karna beyond any doubt.
Hi Bikas, The reference to
Hi Bikas,
The reference to "Rashmirathi" is explicit in the film as Piyush Mishra narrates the rage of Krishna verbatim from it in one of the sequences. It can also be that rather than engaging the viewer in subplots or the story matter itself, the director wanted him to just think for himself. Haven't we had enough of characters we feel sorry/angry/loving/sympathetic about and hence lose the plot by focussing on the trivialities...? Who likes to work anyways?
A very interesting review Bikas !! I
A very interesting review Bikas !! I really liked the way you interpreted the plot, the sub-plots and the narrative. The references that the director is making via different characters, especially by the poetry and songs of Prithvi Banaa, could be termed as a crude comment on the country and its political system. The darkness with colored references also gives us an insight into the dark-comic side of the flick. The cinematography carries the mood of the film meticulously and the songs are well chosen. Whether it is deliberately flawed or not, I liked the film and would recommend it to others.
Very Interesting review
Very Interesting review Bikas…completely agree that its a flawed masterpeice. It promises a lot at the beginning but stops somewhere in the middle without delivering what it originally promised. But one great thing- atleast films like gulal are being made and more importantly nicely marketed and promoted. Anurag is one of the very few filmmakers who’ve stick to their basic style and have finally got their due. Cheers!!!
@Saurabh, Yes, it was nice to hear
@Saurabh, Yes, it was nice to hear Rashmirathi in a Hindi film! I don’t entirely get what you mean but agree that the director intentionally doesn’t let us identify with the characters. However, I don’t agree (if I’ve got you right) that identification comes in the way of following plots and subplots.
@Pranjal, thanks for commenting
@Yasser, nice to hear that you liked the review.
Cheers!
A good review Bikas. I think that
A good review Bikas.
I think that Anurag Kashyap has done a good job here and thought that both Kay Kay Menon and Ayesha Mohan were also good. I would say that Kay Kay Menon has stolen the show and would go on to describe the character played by Ayesha Mohan like a “bitter pill.â€
Nice Review. Good description-flawed
Nice Review. Good description-flawed masterpiece. I enjoyed the movie thoroughly and thought it an awesome watch but knew it was not brilliant cinema so was wondering what to call it. Flawed masterpiece it is.
Thanks Pratik, "bitter
Thanks Pratik, "bitter pill"!!!!
Thanks Ved, yes, I know what you mean, it's not "conventional good storytelling", but the film works despite flouting the conventions.