99: Off the 100 Mark! review
Status
99 is the fresh cinematic innings attempted by Raj Nidimoru in partnership with Krishna DK. Seldom do we come across a Bollywood flick that is playful with its narrative and this one falls in this bracket of exceptions. The thin line between fiction and reality, between reel life and real life is overtly pronounced in the start itself when the screen sprouts the words- "This is a true story. Well, most of it is true. Ok, some of it is true. At least we think that it is true."
The extensive shots of Sachin (Kunal Khemu) against the vibrant backdrop of Mumbai's Gothic architecture rolling the credits coupled with a great background score sets the right line and length for this comedy flick. The variation in the narrative from the present to freeze frames accompanied with voiceover is an innovative welcome into the film. The voiceover also indulges in some foreshadowing and introduces characters with an interesting angle especially his side kick Zaramud (Cyrus Broacha). And if you thought that the cricketing language in this review is the IPL hangover; let me confess my inspiration from the movie itself that weaves in the cricketing tongue into its very script; thus keeping the parallel between the pitch and real life alive all through.
The innings alternating between Mumbai and Delhi keeps sending in one crook after another to the crease. In the midst of this maddening scoring of the big bucks, two love tracks are thrown in, which charm the audience with its realistic touch if nothing else. Pooja (Soha Ali Khan) is not this sweet girl next door besotted by her charming lover but a floor manager who harbours equally ambitious plans as Sachin. What's more? She makes no qualms about it and towards the end, chooses to stick around with her job rather than leaping into the lap of her lover who is still devoid of any status or fame.
Jahnavi (Simone Singh) is the stereotypical, sweet wife of Rahul (Boman Irani) who is caught between the web of loving and forgiving her husband who is addicted to betting. Their apparently mundane telephonic conversations may not be great scripting material but definitely hits high on the scoreboard of reality.
So far so good! 99 strikes as a reliable team with players like the inimitable Boman Irani, the stylish Vinod Khanna, the homespun Mahesh Manjrekar, humorous Cyrus Broacha and the cute Kunal Khemu So where does this inning start losing its run rate one might ask?
An action packed match is the one where the running between the wickets is lightning quick and where the boundaries wield a punch. Similarly, a cop-and-crook story told for the hundredth (or should I say ninety-ninth) time should have some pace in its narrative and few twists in the plot that are knocked off with the right timing and vigour. Also, a thriller of a match is unfurled when each star player gets his due overs to face. When key actors like Khanna, Manjrekar and Broacha are sidelined; the responsibility to take the team through falls heavily on the tender shoulders of young Khemu and Irani. Although these two hold the audience's heart for most part, they come across as mere flash in the pan in the event of the film as a whole falling apart with its lack of pace and interesting plot.
With the T-20 mania high in people's hearts and minds, cricket betting was an interesting pitch to play out your best shots. Unfortunately, lack of clever camera work and shot variations fail to bring out the tension and excitement of the cricket fever. With a bunch of characters making this comedy of errors move forward; the confusion reaches a crescendo but fails to hit the right note.
The impressive opening progressively dwindles and wears out towards the end. The makers need to take a time out and re organize their strategies for future endeavours. The ingredients were not exactly lukewarm but unlike the protagonist, the film fails to hit the coveted century!











Comments( 9 )
Pooja, I entirely agree with you here.
Pooja, I entirely agree with you here. I felt that talented actors such as Vinod Khanna, Boman Irani and Soha Ali Khan, were wasted. the director could have done more when he had these actors in the same scene but he didn't. If he had done so, then I feel it would have been a lot more "explosive" and especially in the gambling scene between Vindo Khanna and Boman Irani.
A good example of a "explosive " scene was in the 1970's Hollywood movie, "The Sting," between Robert Redford and Robert Shaw. Perhaps "Teen Pati" with Amitabh and Sir Ben Kingsley will be better when it comes to such scenes.
Pooja! A good review here by you.
hey pratik, thanks
hey pratik,
thanks for your time and response.....will check out the sting.....and will let you know my reactions....
Like
Like this
Some good points here but overall I
Some good points here but overall I think the movie wrkd quite well. Personally, I wld give it 2 big thums up....4 stars all the way
hey ajay, thats
hey ajay,
thats nice....the director has been able to break even with you....in fact somebody i saw the movie with also loved it completely....
For starters, I loved the film. One of
For starters, I loved the film. One of the best this year, if I might add. And this has been a good year for films!
The review itself is pretty decent, it starts off well, I don't agree with the overall verdict. I believe a reviewer should be objective (but we're all slaves of our own emotions, so once in a while we do succumb). That means one should watch the film on its own terms and not get into a place where you start writing about how/what you would have done had you been the director. I see a little bit of that element in this review.
For instance the bit you wrote about the Boman-Simone scene is how it should be. The scene didn't impress you completely, but you gave it its due. But later on the review started skewing towards what you'd like to watch and how you'd have done it rather than an objective view of what unfolds on screen.
Armaan, I wouldn't say that this year
Armaan, I wouldn't say that this year has been good for the Hindi film industry at all. Because if you look at the dispute that has been going between the Multiplexes and the Distributors / Producers, the knock on effect that I have mentioned about in the "Bollywood" section of the forum, is now taking place, even though there seems to be some sort agreement and the movies are expected to be releasing in June, look at the losses made and the delay with some of the big star cast movies. Also if you look at some of the figures, then this seems to indicate that there have been more flops then hits and more so with the big budget films this year.
Agreed, it's a tumultuous time for the
Agreed, it's a tumultuous time for the industry. I just meant that in the first three months of this year, at least two good films came out - Luck By Chance and Dev.D. Maybe even Gulaal (haven't seen it). Which is more than what usually comes out in an entire year otherwise. For instance I can only think of a couple of good films all of last year...
Armaan. I agree with you with good
Armaan. I agree with you with good films such as "Luck By Chance" and "Dev D," which I have not been able see as yet but also would like to mention "Stoneman Murders" as a good film and "Gulal" wasn't a bad one either. Aslo like you have mentioned that last year, there were perhaps one or two that were good.