Ingmar Bergman's "The Silence" (1963) review
Jugu Abraham writes about Swedish maestro Ingmar Bergman's "Tystnaden (The silence):1963
The Silence was the first Bergman film I ever saw, way back in 1973 as part of a film society screening in Chennai, India. I loved the disturbing and profound film but could not come to grips with why I loved it so much. Was the graphic carnal content (for the social standards of that decade) a reason for my liking it? Was it the austere film making where ticking of a clock was the most important sound effect in the film? Was it because of the mesmerizing performances? Was it due to the theological and existential content? Was it because I knew, even then as a college student, that it would be a folly to evaluate the film without having seen the earlier two films in the trilogy, namely Through a Glass Darkly and Winter Light? As a college student, I confidently wrote in 1974 a lengthy review of Bergman's The Touch (released commercially in India!) in my college magazine but deferred writing on Bergman's The Silence.
Some 25 years after my initial viewing of The Silence, I finally feel confident about writing about the complex film. I still recall telling a friend who was in awe of Spielberg's Jurassic Park sequence where the approach of a dinosaur is first detected by water shaking in a container that the idea was a mere copy of a concept from Bergman's The Silence made 30 years before the Hollywood film. Does this matter, anyway, in a world where people still believe the best in cinema comes from DreamWorks or Hollywood? Even Kubrick's fascinating horror film The Shining seems to have heavily borrowed visuals relating to the boy in an almost empty hotel from The Silence.
There are different strokes to appreciate The Silence.
The first is the theological/existential perspective. Contrary to many published reviews on the trilogy, I find the three films affirm the existence of God in the face of doubt. (Marc Gervais book on Bergman's cinema is perhaps one of the few critical studies that affirm the opposing view). Bergman was the son a Christian Lutheran priest who eventually became the personal chaplain to the King of Sweden. Bergman, revolting against his father's beliefs probably as a consequence of his strict upbringing, was questioning the existence of God through his cinema. Yet Bergman claimed that the trilogy was more directed at absence of love more than the absence of God. What is the silence referring to?
In Through a Glass Darkly, the film ends with the words of the father to the son "God exists in love, every sort of love, maybe God is love" and the son involuntarily exclaims "My father spoke to me." In Winter Light, the favorite Bergman film of Andrei Tarkovsky, the crippled sexton refers to God's silence as the crucified Jesus cries out to his Father in heaven "My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?" But then Tarkovsky was a deeply religious individual and is reported to have memorized the Gospel According to St Mathew-the book in the Bible that attracted Pier Paolo Pasolini as well. In the final film of the trilogy The Silence, the favorite Bergman film of Kieslowski, the ailing sister has a one-sided "conversation" with God "My God, let me come home before I die" and later indirectly refers to God while recollecting her dying father's words "Now it is the eternity." Her prayers are "unanswered" as she dies in a foreign land, alone among strangers. God appears to be quiet; yet the ailing Ester communicates with her nephew by providing him a piece of paper with a foreign word "hadjek" that means "soul" or "spirit". Is that a word that a woman disillusioned with existence of God would pass on to her nephew on her deathbed? I have doubts about Bergman's professed agnosticism. "Hadjek" is the last word of The Silence spoken by Johan reading from the list of foreign words from Ester's letter to him that he jealously guards from his own mother Anna. Somewhat like "rosebud" in Citizen Kane. Again there are two shots towards the end of The Silence that offer Christian symbolism affirming faith in God. First, there is the last shot of Ester her face directed at light from the window, fully exposed to light, as she waits for her eventual death, content at having passed on the letter to her nephew. The second is the last shot of Anna opening her train compartment window to bathe her face in rainwater (a symbol of baptism) having read the contents of the letter that Johan holds in his hands. Both Bergman and Kieslowski professed atheism but their films merely question the existence of God and are often built on strong arguments on theology that can be interpreted to equally satisfy both the Gnostic and the agnostic.
Now Bergman gave names to his film's characters with considerable thought, incorporating Biblical connections that he probably picked up from his father's sermons. The priest Tomas in Winter Light is so named because St Thomas doubted the resurrection of Christ, just as Tomas is questioning the existence of God. Ester in The Silence is obviously named after the Biblical book Esther, one of the only two books in the Bible that does not mention God directly. Does the absence of God mean the book is not holy? By corollary, does the silence of God mean that God does not exist? (Kieslowski, too, while professing to be an atheist made an intensely subtle film Three Colors: Blue that seemed to be a cinematic zoom-out of the essential message of the Biblical chapter 1 Corinthians Chapter 13, sung as a choral rendering towards the end of the film and then made his absolutely riveting Dekalog based on the biblical Ten Commandments). For the atheist viewer of The Silence, too, there is sufficient room to record the director's observation of deserted churches-when Anna truthfully confesses to her elder sister that she had sex with a waiter in an empty church. For the existentialist viewer, there is silence from God to the cries of help from Ester. To really understand the trilogy the viewer needs to understand the Lutheran (relating to Martin Luther) anguish that seems to converge with a Christian existentialist view at the end of each film in the trilogy.
Yet another way to appreciate The Silence is to study the physical silence in the film. Spoken words are indeed few. The film begins with the tick-tock of a watch/clock, which stops when the characters break their silence. The watch is also a metaphor for the limited time of life on earth available for each individual. The sound of the tick-tock increases when Ester is unable to breath and is mortally afraid of dying from suffocation. It is also heard when Anna is reflecting on her post-coital satisfaction in her hotel room. Bach's music is enjoyed by Ester on her transistor and Anna reads about Bach's music in a newspaper advertisement, but the old maitre d'hotel knows the Goldberg variation of the Brandenberg concerto sufficiently to communicate with Ester without language but merely speaking the full name of the composer. Music seems to transcend language barriers. Words are few-the foreign words learnt in the unnamed country relate to "hand", "face" and finally "soul". Much of the visual communication relates to "hands" and "faces", particularly those of Ester. Ester's hands move even when she is sleeping. Ester's hand caresses Anna's hair but stops short of touching the face. The contortions on the faces of Ester and Anna can be lessons for any aspiring actor on lessons to emote without speaking. The denizens of the unnamed country hardly speak, yet we know all is not well, with tanks moving in the night and underfed horses pulling carts of furniture to nowhere. Death seems to be lurking around the corner. One of the few other sounds we hear is the click of the toy gun, disturbing the cleaner of the chandelier. Then there is the clank of the tank negotiating the narrow street outside the hotel. More importantly, silence in the film between individual characters in the film, existing side by side with the theological silence.
A third way to evaluate complex issues of The Silence is to study the camerawork of Sven Nykvist. Much of the brilliance of the black-and-white film revolves around shadows and light, mirrors and last but not the least, close-ups. The carnal events are captured in shadows, while epiphanies are swathed in bright light. These are tools that Bergman and Nykvist master in Persona the film that connects with the content of The Silence though made 3 years later, in which Johan reappears but 3 years older. Nykvist and Bergman use mirrors to indicate the lack of direct communication or rather the presence of bounced communication. When Ester, the translator of languages cannot converse with the maitre d'hotel, she resorts to sign language-even the boy Johan prefers Punch and Judy to communicate his feelings rather than read a book for his sick aunt. The extraordinary performance of one of cinema's finest actresses, Ingrid Thulin, would have been difficult to perceive were it not for Nykvist's close-ups of her face and hands.
A fourth way to approach The Silence is the character of the young boy Johan, who probably is the personification of the young Bergman. Johan is a mix of irreverence (he urinates in the hotel corridor) and innocence (he willingly cross-dresses at the behest of the dwarfs). He is attached to his mother, but respects his aunt even more. As the film un-spools, it is evident that he obeys his mother but is able to connect with the aunt's higher level of intellect, quite aware that she is dying. Johan's father exists but is not physically present. Johan is figuratively squeezed between his mother lacking a "conscience" and an aunt with a domineering and an implied lesbian relationship with his own mother. It is not a perfect life for a boy. Indirectly, Bergman wants the viewer to step into Johan's shoes, irreverent yet innocent and loving. Johan is first introduced to death by the personal collection of family photographs of the maitre d'hotel, including photographs of his dead wife. But John prefers to hide them beneath the carpet but resurrects the subject in his own Punch and Judy show for his aunt.
Finally you can look at The Silence as the quintessential Ingrid Thulin film. I am an unabashed fan of Thulin. The range of her performances from the plain, if not ugly, woman in Winter Light, her brilliant Hollywood turn in The Four Horsemen of Apocalypse, (where her original voice was replaced, the stupidest decision by the filmmakers) to her controversial most talked about role in Visconti's The Damned put you in awe of the lady's talent and latent beauty. In The Silence her facial expressions are the very imprints one associates with Peter O'Toole's thespian turns in cinema. It is no wonder that she acted in films of topnotch directors: Bergman, Visconti, Resnais and Minnelli.
All in all, where do I place this remarkable film of Bergman? One of his very best, second only to Winter Light.
A clip from Silence (1963)
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2_gJc4ZH2M[/youtube]





Comments( 8 )
Great read Mr. Jugu. One of the most
Great read Mr. Jugu. One of the most "difficult and cold" film's I've ever seen.
This is precisely the reason why,
This is precisely the reason why, despite having liked the film, did not do a write up on it. I could never have done justice to it by writing such a detailed review.
A challenge, Jugu. To write on any
A challenge, Jugu. To write on any Bergman film is difficult, especially "The Silence". It has been one of the most disturbing films for me ever, besides "Citizen Kane".
A fascinating analysis of one of the
A fascinating analysis of one of the most obscure and difficult films I have ever seen.
I saw the trilogy some 8 years back when I also was a college student. Of course I did not understand what was going on on screen, nevertheless the film left me disturbed and fascinated. I was forced to think outside traditional modes and comprehend the world in very uncertain terms. God may be a spider, or may be absent altogether. Either thought offered little relief then. And even now I find it difficult to believe that Bergman used the three films to (in a sense) affirm his theological beliefs. And you have argued brilliantly and convincingly that this was a very real possibility. But if that is the case, why do so many viewers feel so alienated and disturbed after viewing the films? I personally belief that Bergman's was an existential approach, though loaded with theological references and symbolism. And all three films remind me very strongly of Albert Camus' The Plague. Man struggling with himself in a godless cosmos.
Good point, Aniruddha. Bergman does
Good point, Aniruddha. Bergman does remind one of Camus and even Kafka (scenes of Through a glass darkly). Bergman was not just creating cinema for the sake of cinema, he was urging viewers to join a game of mental chess (alluding to The Seventh Seal again). One of the reasons I could feel comfortable to finally write a review of "The silence" was that I had finally got to see many of Bergman's fims on DVD. Bergman's cinema is packed with mature thought processes that require repeated viewings to decipher--its not just cinema that you need to know but one has to be well read and know music to play his chess game. Many reviewers of Bergman feel that they understood Bergman by merely looking at his basic story or his handling of actors and the visuals.
One reason for many being "alienated and disturbed," as you put it, is probably because it was fashionable in many circles to be not religious, without really pondering over the question. Bergman was probably always questioning God's existance--but that does not mean that he did not believe in a force that was more powerful than man. Kubrick in 2001 and Tarkovsky in The sacrifice and Solaris seem to sing the same song. For instance, why did both Tarkovsky and Bergman often choose Bach and not, say, Mozart?
Wow, you caught me there at the last
Wow, you caught me there at the last line Jugu .Well, Why did Tark And Berg use Bach? (sorry, my music knowledge is near zero)
Srikant, your question will be answered
Srikant, your question will be answered at length in an article I plan to write in the future.
For the present, Bach was a composer who dealt with grief in his musical compositions with remarkable gravity. The French composer Faure was another. Tarkovsky and Bergman reverted to Bach's requiems often. In "The silence" the sole piece of music heard is the later slow movements of Goldberg variations of the Bach's Brandenberg concerto, which captures the despondent notes of grief. Most directors today resort to Beethoven's Fifth Symphony to suggest impending death.
Several directors choose music because it appeals to their ears without adequate knowledge of the context in which the pieces were written. Some respected Indian directors have done this--now don't ask me who!
haha, Waiting for that article
haha, Waiting for that article eagerly