Doing sex scenes is still what Paoli Dam’s career is all about, a really pathetic excuse of actress.

Cry me a river you phony and pretentious j*rk.

Oh I get it. You are just a kid troll who has lernt about trolling from a senior from good old usenet days. From now on, I will not feed the troll. So this is my last post for you to feed on. In my later posts if any, you dont exist. Geddit?

9 Songs (and other movies like that) has real sex only because director wants publicity controversy because he was and is just a pathetic attention whore and deliberately controversial attention seeking phony fraud.
Director of Chatrak motive was same, only way he can get any publity for himself is deliberately create it, with sex scene. Movie was shown in Berlin film festival and also in Cannes so cut the crap about me not seeing it.

Oh, 9 Songs not called pornographic? Cut that crap also and cut your phony act you naive pseudo-intellec. art twat and nude/sex scene fan.
Try a well known British Critic Chris Tookey who writes for British newspaper Daily Mail: http://www.movie-film-review.com/devFilm.asp?id=14237

Then try some more and do a google search for “9 Songs pornography” Jerk.

And I’ havent met or heard from anyone who’s called the film ’9 songs’ pornographic. A tad boring, yes. Pornograhic, no. But maybe 888 willl cast the first stone?

Meanwhile, what about Pasolini’s last film Salo(which I have serious issues with )? I’ll agree that it is very unethical to make filmslike ‘cannibal holocaust’ though.

But seriously, is ‘cannibal holocaust’ or ‘salo’ (or even Kubrik’s A Clockwork Orange) relevant to discussing an inocent film like Chatrak?

Time’s better spent getting hold of Simone de Beauvoir’s ‘must we burn sade?’ (I lost my copy and cant find another one, not thqat Ive searched hard enough…)

Oh yes, I am male but I sometimes wish I wasnt.

I’ll *partly* reserve my comment on Chatrak, because I haven’t seen the full movie yet (I wasnt at cannes at the right time. etc…). BUT neither has 888, as is clear from his/her post.

Meanwhile, since my last post I have seen legally purchased versions of *all* Paoli Dam films. And I find her, on average, just brilliant. And look, I am 50+ and Paoli. though 11 years older than my daughter, looks *very slightly* like her, so my feeling toward Paoli is of that sort (not everyone 50+ is a sick pervert, you see; plus I had some seriously tense discussions with my daughter about that explicit clip…)

So 888 hasnt seen chtrak, neither have I, but I’ve since my last post legally accessed and seen *all* other Paoli films and on average I am seriously impresssed by her as an actor (I dont know her personally, so I only have subjective opinions – basicallly positive – abour her as a human being, )

So can we reserve judgment of Chatrak until we’ve seen it? And re paoli Dam, I dont think it is anyone else’s business to morally-police her choices (which may or may not be 100% perfect (perfect acccording to who????) )?

“That which is perfect is also dead’” – me quoting/misquoting from memory from Salman Rushdie’s ‘Grimus’, which quote in turn is an obvious summary of existentialist (sp. of the Sartrian stream and in general the left-atheistic streams) thought?

By the way, a German Movie reviewer game this movie a 1/6 rating, a worst possible points (just like the two readers of that review who game the same rating) so there you go.